http://www.accarevision.co.uk/p1-revision/ LSBF ACCA Revision Course – Special offers from LSBF for ACCA students Thu, 14 May 2009 07:00:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6 http://www.accarevision.co.uk/p1-revision/comment-page-1/#comment-57 Busola Adeniji Sat, 09 May 2009 22:45:49 +0000 http://www.cimarevision.co.uk/?p=20#comment-57 In favour, the CEO seems to have the upper arm in this as it is in the contract that he gets the 5 million when he leaves the company.
My arguement against this is that bonues are tied to the performance of the company. If the company isn’t doing well then you don’t get the bonus. Another arguement is that we should be sure of who wrote this contract as the CEO could have been involved in making this decision which would not make it independent as individuals shold not determine their own pay structure.

]]> http://www.accarevision.co.uk/p1-revision/comment-page-1/#comment-54 insiya s tajbhai Fri, 08 May 2009 15:30:51 +0000 http://www.cimarevision.co.uk/?p=20#comment-54 in favor of,since it is written in a contract,the company is obliged to perform it.remuneration of the CEO is determined by the remunerations committee on his appointment so the company is obliged.an argument against it is that if the CEO is involved in some fraud or misappropriation of funds and this may be the reason why the company is in trouble,the CEO may be leaving before he is found out, he should not receive the payment but in fact is liable to forfeit it if indeed he is involved and is caught upon investigation.

]]>