Comments on: F4 Revision http://www.accarevision.co.uk/f4-revision/ LSBF ACCA Revision Course – Special offers from LSBF for ACCA students Thu, 14 May 2009 07:00:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6 By: Muhammad ali http://www.accarevision.co.uk/f4-revision/comment-page-1/#comment-76 Muhammad ali Wed, 13 May 2009 15:20:44 +0000 http://www.accarevision.co.uk/?p=133#comment-76 Answer (C) is correct, On 3 september Ken Ltd wrote “ I accept “, in the same letter there is another offer from Ken Ltd to Anita Ltd about payment terms. Actually this second sentence is payment option which can be settled by mutual acceptance of both parties at anytime after the acceptance of contract. Postal rules applies on Acceptance when posted so on 3rd of September the contract has been formed.

]]> By: benard otieno maenya http://www.accarevision.co.uk/f4-revision/comment-page-1/#comment-75 benard otieno maenya Wed, 13 May 2009 08:23:14 +0000 http://www.accarevision.co.uk/?p=133#comment-75 the answer is c, Anita Ltd and Ken Ltd had a contract on 3rd September. kens’ ltd statement of 3rd September of “will you accept payment in over 3 months” should be treated as request for more information on terms of payment which Anita didn’t state but not as a counter offer. Anita ltd breached the contract on 6th by selling the machine yo a new ltd as the agreements between Anita ltd and ken ltd were expected to complete by 10th and hence Anita Ltd acted wrongly before hearing finally from ken ltd before the Anita’s stated date of not later than 10th September

]]> By: Ahmed http://www.accarevision.co.uk/f4-revision/comment-page-1/#comment-64 Ahmed Mon, 11 May 2009 00:24:44 +0000 http://www.accarevision.co.uk/?p=133#comment-64 As in seen Adams v Lindsell (1818)
the same Postal Rule applies here, when Ken Ltd Posted the acceptance letter on 3rd september, the contract was formed, that very instant.
The futher contents of the letter, asking Anita Ltd about the 3months credit period, is NOT a counter offer but a request for Information.

Thus the Answer to this question would be C
Anita Ltd and Ken Ltd had a contract on 3rd September.

]]> By: khusro khan http://www.accarevision.co.uk/f4-revision/comment-page-1/#comment-28 khusro khan Tue, 05 May 2009 17:26:58 +0000 http://www.accarevision.co.uk/?p=133#comment-28 i think answer c is correct because ken ltd accepted the offer on 3 sep. after that ken ltd just giving the payment options to anita.

]]> By: hussein basri http://www.accarevision.co.uk/f4-revision/comment-page-1/#comment-25 hussein basri Tue, 05 May 2009 09:24:32 +0000 http://www.accarevision.co.uk/?p=133#comment-25 answer b, there is no contract between Anita ltd and Ken ltd because kem ltd’s letter of 3 september amounted to counter offer, which destroyed anita ltd’s original offer

]]>